Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979  
 
Section 9 
 
CD Track #9: Four Specific Interventions for Anxious Thoughts  
 
Table of Contents | NCCAP/NCTRC CE Booklet 
 
Get Audio Track: Open a new window with Ctrl N,  
Left click audio track to Listen,  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 
  What's the Evidence?  
Your anxious client, in the simplest terms, believes, "Something bad 
is going to happen that they won't be able to handle." According to Beck, 
all of the cognitive therapist's questions can be broken down to one of these 
questions:  
1. "What's the evidence?"  
2. "What's another way of looking at the situation?" and  
3. "So what if it does happen?"  
  I 
    find some clients respond better to one approach than to another. However, I find 
    the clients with the highest success rate develop skill in using all three approaches. 
   
  4 Specific Interventions for Anxious Thoughts  
    Let's look at some specific interventions that help your client answer this 
    question regarding his or her anxious thoughts. We will look at Analysis of Faulty 
    Logic, a Three-Column Technique, Providing Information and Hypothesis Testing. 
   
   Intervention #1. Analysis of Faulty Logic  
    As you 
    know, a standard method is to review the client's logic in constructing his experiences. 
    For example, Ethel, a sixty-seven-year old woman, was extremely anxious about 
    and believed she would fail a written driving exam although she passed a previous 
    one. I led her to concede that there was no evidence that she would fail (other 
    than her thoughts that the second test could be harder that the first), and that 
    she could read the license manual.  
   
    When the client recognized that she 
    was "jumping to conclusions," her anxiety subsided sufficiently to allow 
    her to study for the test and, as a result, her anxiety went down even more. When 
    she did pass the exam, I used the success as further evidence of her competence. 
   
   Intervention #2. The Three-Column Technique  
    Clients can 
    identify thinking errors by the three-column technique. In the first column, the 
    client describes an anxiety-producing situation; in the second, his or her automatic 
    thoughts; in the third column, types of errors found in these thoughts. By doing 
    this, the client practices viewing his experience from the vantage point of a 
    neutral ally rather than from that of a predictor of doom. This technique is usually 
    viewed by the client initially as an "intellectual" exercise; however, 
    this exercise with practice, usually takes on personal meaning to the client to 
    help him answer the question "Where's the evidence?" 
     
     Intervention #3. Providing Information  
      Lack of information 
      or erroneous information may increase the client's anxiety. Kelly, a 20-year-old 
      college student, was afraid of going insane regarding stress over grades and assignments. 
      However, she was unaware of the symptoms of schizophrenia. Her fear was alleviated 
      after I explained the difference between hallucination and delusion and the symptoms 
      of anxiety. 
     
      When a client exaggerates the actual odds of his experiencing 
      a feared event, the therapist can provide realistic information to enable him 
      to reassess the potential of danger. Thus, point out if a person could die only 
      as a result of a plane crash, he would live to be a million years old; or, if 
      he could die only because of an automobile accident, he would live to be over 
      three thousand years old (Marquis). 
     
     Intervention #4. Hypothesis Testing  
      Probably much of the homework you assign between sessions involves testing hypotheses. 
      As you know, it's best to encourage your client to write out his prediction of 
      dire consequences for later evaluation so as to accumulate a recorded body of 
      data disproving the client's catastrophic predictions. As one negative consequence 
      after another fails to occur, the client's belief in the certainty of impending 
      disaster usually begins to weaken. 
     
    Here is a list of hypotheses I've 
      used; compare them with yours. 
    1. I'm too anxious to even read. 
    2. I'm 
      too anxious even to make an outline for a speech. 
    3. I'm too nervous to call 
      and ask for information. 
    4. I can't even talk to a stranger. 
    5. I can't 
      do anything when this symptom comes on. 
    6. I can't make any decisions. 
    7. I can't think or talk about this -- it's too frightening. 
    8. I can't do 
      anything to control my anxiety. 
     
      I motivate the client into testing the 
      hypothesis by setting up a "no lose" situation, since each test of a 
      hypothesis, no matter what the outcome, provides useful data. 
 
 |